Thanks to my Twitter friends, I’ve just jumped into this interesting Zawya’s article (based on AFP) “Murdoch’s pan-Arab foray seen as ‘Trojan horse’ in Egypt”.
The article starts like that:
“The tie-up between Arab entertainment giant Rotana and pro-Israel media mogul Rupert Murdoch is viewed in Egypt not only with suspicion but as signalling the decline of Arab film and art heritage”.
I’m actually more surprised for this article coming from AFP rather than for its actual contents.
Arabs now fearing that this alliance would bring “normalisation” to Arab-Israeli relations and would result into a benefit for Israel frankly looks a bit naif.
Murdoch and Al Waleed have been doing business together for a long time. The Saudi Prince is actually the only non- family member to own a stake in Murdoch’s News Corp capital (see 23 January post on this blog).
In 1997 the Time reports Al Waleed stating that:
“I want to concentrate on communications, technology, entertainment and news. This is the future. News Corp. is the only truly global news and entertainment company.”
In the same article, the alleged “Israeli connection” is also brought to light:
“His business investments in the Middle East, for example, provide him with direct access to Arab heads of state, on whom he may have a moderating influence, since many of Alwaleed’s international partners are Jewish and support Israel. “Religion has never been a barrier between us,” says Four Seasons Hotels Inc. CEO Isadore Sharp. “He mentioned once that we have similar value systems and moral principles.”
Al Waleed and Murdoch have been involved in a long time business friendship.
Why are Arabs so scared of Murdoch bringing pro- Israeli arguments in the Region now that he owns a stake in Rotana
Didn’t they know that the Prince has been directly involved in News Corp. for many years?
Why haven’t they questioned him before?
is a smart businessman, he has investments in major sectors of Western economies (hotels, entertainment, technology, etc). He is also smart in the Middle East, where at the same time he sponsors “liberal” pop channels like Rotana
and Islamic entertainment stations like Al Risala TV
Once I attended a media forum in Dubai
, many years ago, and the Prince
was there. At the time, Muslim riots
were exploding everywhere in France
, particularly in Paris suburbs. The Prince said he was not happy about the way Fox News
(which belongs to News Corp
) was covering the events, being it anti-Muslims biased. So he just picked up the phone and called his long-time friend in order to “adjust” the coverage.
(as the AFP take
reported by Zawya
reminds: “When in 2005 Alwaleed was reported as saying he had influenced how Fox News depicted rioting in heavily Muslim suburbs in France, the conservative Accuracy in Media group called for an investigation”).
It’s a funny story and Arabs should bear this in mind when they start pointing at a pro-Israeli (or anti-Arab) conspiracy.
Is this starting only because Murdoch is finally coming himself to Region?
Did everybody in the Arab world really ignore that Al Waleed was doing business with Murdoch since long time ago?
Were they so “naif” to ignore the fact that, by owning a significant stake in News Corp., the Prince could have actually an influence himself on its editorial strategy instead of being passively influenced by it?
Business is business, and sometime this is true also in the Arab world. Al Waleed has been working with Murdoch for many years in order to grow his commercial interests in Western profitable media industries. Being Murdoch a pro-Israeli or not, this doesn’t matter to Al Waleed so much. They are both businessmen in a global economy.
That would be great if Arab journalists and intellectuals would once focus on the deeper political-economical implications of this deal, perform the duties of investigative journalism and do analysis, instead of going back always to the same old story of “conspiracy” which mostly helps maintaining a passive and not constructive attitude in the Arab world.